Wednesday, January 25, 2012

POTUS, SOTU, and Education

I've been asked a lot today what I thought about last night's SOTU. 

My answer? Meh. 

It was decent, but in a 21st century Bruce Springsteen sort of way. The Rising is a good album, but it's nowhere near as great as Born To Run, or Darkness on the Edge of Town. In the same way, I've been spoiled by nearly four years of intelligent, compelling oratory. President Obama was good, but not great last night.

Yes, the economy seems to be improving. Yes, he has kept his promise to get our troops out of Iraq. Yes, our armed forces killed Osama bin Laden. All good.

But President Obama's commitment to education is worrisome. First, the study claiming "good teachers" add $250,000 in lifetime income to a class of students doesn't amount to much. About $250 per year per student. Not exactly compelling data.

Speaking of data, it's the other problem. President Obama's and Arne "Coach" Duncan's plan to improve teaching means more teaching to standardized tests. Standardized tests do not measure a student's ability to think critically, to reason, to analyze, to synthesize. Attaching scores to a teacher's evaluation is simply ludicrous. 

I thought about analyzing the SOTU much more, but Anthony Cody beat me to it:
Teachers have already chosen to put our shoulders to the wheel of inequality. Those of us who work with children in poverty are making tremendous sacrifices to meet their needs. The reason child poverty has expanded over the past two decades has nothing to do with "bad teachers," and everything to do with the huge concentration of wealth, and the devastation of America's manufacturing base, as millions of jobs have been shipped overseas in pursuit of higher profits.

No comments:

Post a Comment